CIVIL Disobedience II
In the last article we report entitled Civil Disobedience I, we collected different opinions and we have requested by many, that not only we stay in the complaint, since this is the easiest part of any dissatisfaction, but we gave ideas. We are esoteric and therefore our cultural base and our moral schemas have nothing to do with politics and is likely to go into this matter we seem dreamers and visionaries. But responding to this demand, and a very simple way, we respond to those we have requested.
Hermetic One law says that everything in the Cosmos is hierarchy. There is always one higher and one lower, a more intelligent and a more ignorant, A galaxy is larger or older and a smaller or younger. There is nothing that is not subject to the law, but new research in quantum physics that would emphasize the concept of Fractal denies categorically the concept to speak of a homogeneous whole that destroys the concept of superior or inferior, to move the process of being or not being aware of your situation at all.
From the perspective of conceiving the universe as a fractal, which again using Hermetic law tells us that THIS ONE IN ALL AND ALL IN ONE, it can not Hierarchy exist. Being in the All or the Whole Being, is destroyed in himself the idea of \u200b\u200bthe individual and therefore of the Hierarchy of the Upper and Lower Beings. Just an insignificant thousandth of a second vibrating or perceive to be Nirvana that everything is correct, that all is and is in no hierarchy itself, that the ego is diluted by the fullness of consciousness where you are definitely confused and I to become the U.S..
But unfortunately at work at home or in day to day, we are not in Nirvana but in the maelstrom of survival. We live in a third dimension, where the strong eat the weak and the smartest are best situated to the materialistic life we \u200b\u200blive. We have a spirit of pride. We consciously and unconsciously adopting the ethological model of nature, where male is the stronger and better equipped and gives us spirit of survival to fight and try to get the prominent position where being the strongest, provides females. And the females, fight to death for the best male to mate and have children above. Fight, species selection, genetic improvement. These models are in our genes in a pathological and not contemplate other life than this.
Some may say that we are not animals and therefore the above model is primitive Unfortunately we are beings die of starvation 70,000 a day, we destroy our own habitat and fratricidal struggles that we have from the beginning of history brings us to the tail of the animal ethological model.
I leave these philosophical musings, to go into more mundane issues and homespun. I mean the political model that we in the West. According to this addition to the spirit of pride, it seems normal to have a breed that dominates and one that is dominated. And this concept requires obedience to it has more weapons, more argument, more handsome or have better resources. Even divine laws invented by men, we say that obedience is a virtue. In obedience to a superior army is not only a virtue but criminal if you disobey. In the Middle Ages was even more complicated, since it is stated that the earl and marquis of the day, was by the grace of God and therefore accept the rule or the droit de seigneur of the Marquis was either implicitly: Obey God. Then came the French Revolution and things changed a bit. We found democracy, but even after the time we respond to our behavior in ethological animal model and this is why I go to the gym to show my muscle power and I bought a Prada model to differentiate yourself from which I want to compete and be to males or females more endowed.
seems natural that a ruling class to guide and lead us to the welfare state. The political model we have is an expression of the spirit of pride that lives with me every day. Everything comes from hierarchy, even when we eat, or go to the bathroom. I can eat lobster or beans, but one is more expensive, a cheaper and then I can go to a bathroom that has pedals and gold taps or latrines.
This hierarchical concept is pathetic when there is the saint and the sinner. There are no more harmful than drugs which ends up being spiritual master overnight and goes outside to give the plate to save you from your ignorance. Is the contact with the gods and the "silly ass" who does not know anything and you have to pay a course of preparation for contact with extraterrestrials, while filling the pockets of the guru and sent vanity feeds of the gods. In religious cults, it follows the same pattern as that between God and the "poor ignorant of the street there is a caste" chosen by God "to guide our steps towards concepts like heaven, limbo or heaven where maidens are spread dozens who has been bent to the wishes of the priestly caste. The funny thing is that God intended to serve or transmit, is but a poor invention of what a few envisioned as a model of perfection. I've always said that if these messengers of God, get a glimpse of just a tenth of a second of the conception of higher dimension, the shame would silence them forever and would stop selling religious nonsense invented by a god who exists only in hallucinations of a failed prophet of the past.
We have become so accustomed to this hierarchical model blessed by God, to vote, as we say, is a privilege and a moral duty. To be a good citizen I vote for a closed list where the first, second or fourth is an incompetent, a sausage or a fool. I vote to perpetuate the power to real political movements based on blind obedience and submission to the favors that gives an institution that puts you charge your disposal.
The funny thing is that if we mention our love for our homeland or our love for democracy, now VOTE is not only not a duty but a felony of failure to let things continue as usual. If I love my country I should not vote or facilitate this state of affairs. But not enough not to vote, but implement alternatives that can enable change this state of affairs.
I've said many times now and again I express the same idea that should make their way slowly through the sentient beings.
I believe that democracy requires a simple assembly system to implement. Again I explain in brief.
- If for example are 30,000,000 million people entitled to vote, just select every four years to ten percent of citizens to create assemblies that can form a government to lead the nation .
- If my neighborhood are two who have been chosen by lot, just a coffee and ask: what do you do in life ?.... because I am licensed in this or which matter and I have this career, this money and these ideas. I am peinaovejas, and although I have the same dignity that you understand that you are more prepared than me, so you should be you who represent us in the next assembly.
- In the second assembly, and we do not join those in my neighborhood but of the four people in my area and only have to make a meal or meeting, where direct knowledge of my neighbors designate the most qualified, which logically go to the next and so on to get the country's cadre. In the same table includes the opposition. Can not be done today for tomorrow undone, as is customary in our times.
- Above this government elected by the people would be a Council of Elders, who must necessarily be larger, transparent and qualified. This Council would ensure by the Constitution. Not like now is the army that can be charged against the people it is the army that guaranteed by the Constitution. This board has no executive power wise but in any case consultative who would retake the course if the current government would endanger the nation. Do not be like that in Spain now have 22% of unemployed (actually 28% counting self) and more than a million families in which no member is working and people can do nothing but wait until the end of the legislature as the current government resigns and makes sense of status or self-criticism.
- The democratically elected government can use consultants in various fields. And of course the four or five years would leave the government to begin other elections same as above.
- current politicians would say that the people are not ready to govern. Since then seen the current state of national and international policy, this ruling class can not judge in this regard given its failure. And among 30 million citizens refuse to believe me that there can be a dozen or two qualified men within the various branches of knowledge, Industry, trade and international relations.
- This scheme can be considered a utopia, but every project stems from a basic idea is born, perfect and is done in time. We have a tool that a hundred or a thousand years did not exist. I am referring to current media and Internet, for the first time in human history we can send information simultaneously to millions of people and viewed in real time at minimal cost.
- is to create a party of all the disaffected, those who do not vote and those with other social, political and moral. This game would end in time by an absolute majority to change the constitution and begin assembly-MODEL exposed in this article.
- can do better: Of course, this idea must flow, must be nurtured and channeled and directed by persons qualified to get reach that hypothetical change.
- Desparecerían political parties, which are really a scourge to society of XXI century.
Then, when this hypothetical government existed, would change all that now do not work. Of course, but first we must get a basic model that works and does not perpetuate a class of disabilities that are leading to extreme concern.
As I said before, this is an idea that can be collected, fed and released by who has the intelligence and means to do so. So we will have fewer Messiah, enlightened gurus and politicians in the name of the country we are making life impossible.
Some may say this is impossible to achieve utopia, but it would be nice to be repaired on who and how the French Revolution began, by Masons and Freemasons as you can see who signed the Magna Carta United States. They were visionaries, lunatics and misfits that as in the Russian revolution set in motion a change that would lead to greater social justice. Of course the failed Soviet model and the U.S. has little or nothing to do with the model established in the Constitution. And of course this idea will not succeed easily as we are not deluded, Si, but I refuse to do nothing or not thousands of people screaming my ideas. This e-mail that is sent to the debate is about a hundred thousand emails. If you pick it up, what improvements, debates and send it to as many thousands, we can start planting a concern, this concern arises from the discontent and the comparison, then move on to an illusion to get us out of the moral crisis sociological in which we installed.
Licerio Moreno
ALTERNATIVE POLICY
Democracy today is completely finished. His current work does devolve to the countries. I will not enter if politicians make much or little money for doing bad things and bring their peoples to ruin. Nor will I say that this political class is fortunately an endangered species. In this political system if I were President of a nation surely I should behave as they behave today. We must change the system. Unable to advance the development of a country if the government is putting bricks and trying to build the country and the Opposition lags destroying what the Government intends to build and also get paid for it. As it turns out has not built anything and the government is very bad and very good opposition. There are new elections and win the Opposition who has spent the last parliamentary destroying what the Government or by stopping to do so. And it's easier to destroy than to build so that at the end of the legislature for the country the result was negative. And although it sometimes got some progress, but will not be "thanks to" democracy and its political but "despite".
previous Opposition becomes Government and be in opposition. To continue the war and destroy everything the government does or attempts to do. And so we live on a miracle.
woman, "to change the system."
I'm not as drastic as Licerio Moreno (previous article). Keep the political parties but after the general election all political parties would have to pull in the direction of the President-elect, who belong to the winning political party. All political parties have representation in government. Many ministers in relation to the number of votes obtained. All political parties would be in the Council of Ministers. All summary and either subtract. Result, the country would advance at breakneck speed.
In this system of government there would be no opposition.
Four years after general elections are held. Election Campaign fortnight in which it is a summary of what has contributed to the country each political party through their representatives as ministers in the Government of the Nation. Win the best elections and form government did it again with all political forces. And we all pull in the direction agreed upon by the President and his Council of Ministers. It is not that difficult.
And most important of all is that the political hierarchy is not based on the economic power of its members but in increasing the capacity of Community Service.
Santiago Merino
